Author |
Pictures taken with the Nokia 7650 |
laffen Joined: Aug 07, 2001 Posts: > 500 From: Oslo, Norway PM |
Normal resolution (25kb):
High resolution (32kb):
|
|
ElGato Joined: Nov 27, 2001 Posts: 328 From: Sweden PM, WWW
|
I don't see much difference..
And both resolutions are blurry, especially around the edges..
|
Froddan Joined: Jan 18, 2002 Posts: > 500 PM |
Considering that it's a phone, which took those pictures, I think they're very good.
I doubt that the quality will be better in other phones, after all that's what they are, phones |
ewap8 Joined: Nov 30, 2001 Posts: 398 From: Dubai PM |
I do spot some difference of quality between the two.
But really, considering they were taken from a phone, they are nice!
I'm member #100 on this website. I think! |
stevo Joined: Jan 11, 2002 Posts: 114 From: Dunstable, england PM |
yeh it would be nice to have a comparison of the same photo taken with a communicam, i reckon the sony ericsson would be better
|
jas Joined: Jan 18, 2002 Posts: 240 PM |
I get the impression that the Nokia camera produces images that tend to be a bit more blurry than the ones from MCA-20. On the other hand, the MCA-20 images suffer from the "zipper" effect --- that every second pixel is bright and every other second pixel is dark around the egdes, producing a "zipper" or "checkerboard" pattern along edges in the image.
I guess Nokia has settled for a more blurry image with less zipper effect.
-Jas |
$pídymáN Joined: Jul 16, 2002 Posts: 2 From: Manila PM |
Quote:
|
On 2002-07-15 21:28, ElGato wrote:
I don't see much difference..
And both resolutions are blurry, especially around the edges.. |
|
you can see the difference near the end of the motorcycle... the back is a bit sharper on "hi res", but the edges are the same, i guess. but good enough for a phone!
|
shawnmccall9 Joined: Apr 21, 2002 Posts: > 500 From: Chicago, IL USA PM |
@ Laffen
is that your scooter? love that cherry red
|
captainsm Joined: Jun 25, 2002 Posts: > 500 PM |
Don't like 'em !
I think the MCA-20 does a better job ! |
kieboy Joined: Jun 07, 2002 Posts: 200 From: SE World PM |
that's a scooter?!?!?! i dont think so! hehehe
~ P910i ~ P910i Freak! |
john74 Joined: Dec 21, 2001 Posts: > 500 From: GREECE/AUSTRALIA PM, WWW
|
guys i have both the MCA-20 and the 7650 let me tell you that the nokias resolution is way better than the MCA-20,ive got some great snap shots from my MCA-20 but ive got better ones from my 7650
|
laffen Joined: Aug 07, 2001 Posts: > 500 From: Oslo, Norway PM |
@shawnmccall9
Yes, it's my bike. Honda Hornet CB600 |
Andy. Joined: Apr 27, 2002 Posts: > 500 PM |
A MCA 20 pic
it's much better
the two white things at the bottom of the pic is the top of a fence
if they were not there it would be a better picture.
Can't see the damn screen when it's sunny though.
[ This Message was edited by: Andy. on 2002-07-31 12:40 ] |
Bajie Joined: May 20, 2002 Posts: 92 From: London PM |
Think your being a tad harsh.
MCA20 picture taken in sunny conditions with no close subject.
Nokia picture taken as a close up with no bright colours in the subject.
I've taken pictures [indoors] with an MCA20 and the quality did leave a little to be desired.
I'm not pro Nokia or anti SonyEricsson.
I will quite happily admit to having seen some very good quality pictures taken with MCA20 though.
|
|