Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Technical > CID49 camera against CID36 camera - what Differences?

Author CID49 camera against CID36 camera - what Differences?
Randolph
K750
Joined: May 21, 2007
Posts: 115
PM
Posted: 2007-07-04 22:12
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I want to swap a CID 49 camera for the older CID 36 camera. I want to do the same - but when buying a camera module:how can I be shure to buy a CID36 camera?

I want to do this due to quality issues. Take fotos with macro: nearly the same. Take Landscape pics and you see the difference.

Are there any differences or serial numbers? How can I distinguish between CID49 and CID36 camera modules?

Thanks for help!
Sammy_boy
C510 Black
Joined: Mar 31, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Staffordshire, United Kingdom
PM, WWW
Posted: 2007-07-04 22:36
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
As far as I know there's no difference in camera modules, they are identical - I've swapped many a module with no discernible difference in photo quality!

Any differences there might be would be dependent on firmware versions, not the module itself.
"All it takes for evil to flourish is for good men to do nothing" - Edmund Burke

strizlow800
G900 Brown
Joined: Aug 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Macedonia, Skopje
PM
Posted: 2007-07-04 22:52
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
The camera as a hardware part is the same. The only difference may be the firmware and mostly the camera driver.
Sony Ericsson software/hardware support!

Phone Flashing Tutorial (DB2020 CID49/51/52)
Randolph
K750
Joined: May 21, 2007
Posts: 115
PM
Posted: 2007-07-05 12:43
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I cant agree with that: Take a landscape shot and then see the different in sharpnes. Close shots are good in both new and old phones...

Some folks here have changed the cam module from CID49 phone to the old CID36 phone: digitl 4x zoom works again and picture quality improved.

Here are picture one guy sent me who did it:


OLD cam - CID36


NEW cam - CID49


See also http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=135737&start=4305 (middle of the page...)
tranced
LG Nexus 4
Joined: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Santo Domingo, wonDeRland
PM
Posted: 2007-07-05 14:19
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
indeed. the cid49 camera is worst than the cid36. the cid49 has more noise.
I jay0726 | (+3, 0) | Clara, Evita, Mimmi & Victoria | My Pics | Do your job!
Sammy_boy
C510 Black
Joined: Mar 31, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Staffordshire, United Kingdom
PM, WWW
Posted: 2007-07-05 14:28
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
The digital zoom is firmware dependent, it could just be that there is a bit of variation in the quality control of the units.
"All it takes for evil to flourish is for good men to do nothing" - Edmund Burke

Randolph
K750
Joined: May 21, 2007
Posts: 115
PM
Posted: 2007-07-05 14:43
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
But does anybody know how to really and sfe distinguish between the CID49 and CID39 cam except the missing small parts??

[ This Message was edited by: Randolph on 2007-10-04 13:03 ]
strizlow800
G900 Brown
Joined: Aug 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Macedonia, Skopje
PM
Posted: 2007-07-05 14:57
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Damn, I thought they are completely the same... Sorry it's my mistake after all . But I don't get the point of producing the same phones with different new CID which has worse camera than the old one...
Sony Ericsson software/hardware support!

Phone Flashing Tutorial (DB2020 CID49/51/52)
tranced
LG Nexus 4
Joined: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Santo Domingo, wonDeRland
PM
Posted: 2007-07-05 15:06
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
in the pictures we can easily see that the CID49 cam misses a lot of "chips". could this be the reason of the poor quality of the photos?
I jay0726 | (+3, 0) | Clara, Evita, Mimmi & Victoria | My Pics | Do your job!
Randolph
K750
Joined: May 21, 2007
Posts: 115
PM
Posted: 2007-07-05 15:17
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
holy moly - why have I not recognized this ... seem I work too long/much??
THX - Thatīs it...
THERE IS A SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE ... not only in quality.
best regards,
Chris
tranced
LG Nexus 4
Joined: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Santo Domingo, wonDeRland
PM
Posted: 2007-07-05 15:24
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
really?!?!?! you didnt notice it?
I jay0726 | (+3, 0) | Clara, Evita, Mimmi & Victoria | My Pics | Do your job!
Randolph
K750
Joined: May 21, 2007
Posts: 115
PM
Posted: 2007-07-05 18:07
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
8-(( ... I was just staring on the figures printed on them late late in the night. But now I did it - I changed the cam from CID49 back to CID36 version:

See the results: better overall quality, see details far away, full 4x zoom in fine quality. Sony-Ericsson, what have you done to the CID49 cam module... SHAME on you!!!

all pictures done with Sarmadīs 5.7 driver (sharpness 4)

CID49


CID36


auto


4x zoom


Now I will test if colour-correction for CID49 has to be removed...

[ This Message was edited by: Randolph on 2007-07-05 18:31 ]
PowerLee
Nokia Lumia 928
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Posts: 344
PM
Posted: 2007-08-28 20:04
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2007-07-05 14:28:24, Sammy_boy wrote:
The digital zoom is firmware dependent, it could just be that there is a bit of variation in the quality control of the units.



No its not, its down to the hardware.

Flash a CID 49 phone thats been nobbled by SE with a firmware that has zoom & then try & use it, the zoom wont work correctly & you cant even save pictures with any zoom effect.

But do a straight swop from a CID 49 camera on a nobbled K750I to a CID 36 camera & using the same software & drivers that only had 1 x zoom on largest picture setting with CID 49 camera & you get a perfect 4 x zoom working with the CID 36 camera.
Aware
T650 Black
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Oxon, UK
PM
Posted: 2007-08-28 20:29
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Everyone is correct on the cam modules! SE pulled a fast one at K800 launch, so that K750 wouldn't rob K800's sales! Hence cheaper module/non-zoom firmware.......

.....and some still think SE aren't all about the money these days.....thankfully, we know better, and can counteract their sneaky shenanigans.....

p990i(r6d), n82-1(20.0.062)
* treat people as you expect to be treated! *
a-zott platinum/tttt in ~3 years...
rip expanded call lists!
Dzyzus
K750
Joined: Nov 12, 2006
Posts: 42
PM
Posted: 2008-04-11 13:13
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Yes I have changed my cid49 cam to cid36 (zoom works) but in quality I don't see difference (useing sarmad 5.7 for k750 CID36 driver). I have k750i flashed to w800. Maybe change firmware? Any ideas? Thank you
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi