| Author |
Will we ever see a T610 without the camera? |
Aikonoklast
Joined: Feb 02, 2002
Posts: 363
PM |
Frankly the camera sux, so I'd rather be without it. Or are all the latest phones cursed with a sucky camera? |
|
|
araicher
Joined: Jun 12, 2003
Posts: 35
From: Brazil
PM |
Well, since you don't like it, just don't use it!
I find it very useful, specially when I need to show something to anyone at work when I'm far away from there.
Allan |
mredd27
Joined: Jul 07, 2003
Posts: 141
From: UK
PM |
I didn't really want a camera on my phone either, but the T610 has everything else I want so I bought it and simply don't use the camera. Why can't you do this? It doesn't hurt to have it there even if you aren't using it. |
masseur
Joined: Jan 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sydney, London
PM |
The trend at the moment seems to be camera phones and I doubt that will change for quite a while as it makes more money for the networks as people get tempted to use MMS or to send pics via email.
I guess its down to expectations too. If you are expecting 2 or 3 mega pixel quality then of course you will be dissapointed. If you are expecting to take quick snaps, say at a party or to add a photo to a contact etc then it is more than adequate.
Personally I think the T610 cam performs perfectly well for its purpose.
|
Kijori
Joined: Jul 18, 2003
Posts: 3
PM |
yup, don't see why you can't ignore it even if it's there. |
JWBlue
Joined: Apr 10, 2002
Posts: 104
From: t68i to t610 to k700i to k750i
PM |
your buying a fone not a digicam! |
l6gtv
Joined: Apr 24, 2003
Posts: 111
PM |
fair enuff you can ignore it, but the weight it adds.
the t610 would have lighter, now that is better than a shite camera.
|
gotska
Joined: Apr 28, 2003
Posts: 60
PM |
well, of course the camera sucks. See it for what it is. Something like a bad xerox copy. One thin very useful is that the T610 takes photos of text from close up. Text from books, posters, computer monitor etc that you want to remember. That is really useful. |
gzumba
Joined: Feb 04, 2003
Posts: 146
From: New York, NY, USA
PM |
I doubt the cam adds much weight. Probably cheaper to throw it in even for those who don't want it, rather than have to produce a different model identical, sans cam. Same could be said for bluetooth or other features not used by everyone. Personally I never use the cam attachment but might use it if it were on the phone, at least in a pinch. I think it has as yet untapped potential.
This message was posted from a T300 |
mredd27
Joined: Jul 07, 2003
Posts: 141
From: UK
PM |
Quote:
|
fair enuff you can ignore it, but the weight it adds.
the t610 would have lighter, now that is better than a shite camera. |
|
I can assure you that if you had two T610's, one with and one without the camera, you wouldn't be able to tell the difference between the two as far as the weight in concerned. The camera is literally just a tiny chip with a plastic lens in front of it. |
T.Bear
Joined: Jul 05, 2003
Posts: 23
PM |
I don't understand that guys who are telling us all the time that "Camera sucks"!? Do they know what is camera, what is digital camera? I don't think so. In years that are coming incorporated
cameras in mobile phones, will be better and better. But even today,
camera in T610 is interesting and valuable product. I like it, because
I can take a photo of some person and put it in phonebook. And
quality of that photo is good enough for that purpose. When I want
something more than that, I take my digital camera or my 35mm SLR
camera. Please stop with that criticism and grumbling like old virgin. |
ruff rider
Joined: Mar 01, 2002
Posts: 203
From: Manchester, UK
PM |
Nobody is expecting a 5 megapixel camera, just one which is comparable to the competition. Take the gd87 for example, vastly superior quality . . . with zoom functionality! Still, at least it has a camera . . .
This message was posted from a Nokia |
T.Bear
Joined: Jul 05, 2003
Posts: 23
PM |
Why are you expecting the best camera on T610? I don't get it.
T610 is very good phone. I like it because of all the features it has,
because of good GPRS, bluetooth, synch with PC etc etc. If camera
is so important for you, OK buy that GD87 or whatever. I don't
think that we must have a phone with all the best features on it.
I don't think that T610 needs to have camera like GD87, and I don't
think that GD87 needs to have bluetooth, synch with PC like T610 etc.
Some day when I buy Ferrari I will not expect the best comfort in it.
|
ruff rider
Joined: Mar 01, 2002
Posts: 203
From: Manchester, UK
PM |
For the record I have got a gd87 amongst others, and no I don't expect the T610 to have the *best* camera, just one that is better than the current one. Don't get me wrong, I'm happy with my T610 but the camera is the weak link in an otherwise perfect package.
This message was posted from a T610 |
se turkey
Joined: May 11, 2003
Posts: 29
From: tr
PM, WWW
|
no1 see ths phone without a cam
|
|
|
Posted: 2003-07-18 00:46
